Unit 6. ConsiderationВстречное предоставление

В силу обязательств одно лицо (должник) обязано совершить в пользу другого лица (кредитора) определенное действие, либо воздержаться от определенного действия, как-то: передать имущество, выполнить работу, уплатить деньги и т.

п., либо воздержаться от определенного действия, а кредитор имеет право требовать от должника исполнения его обязанности. Обязательства должны исполняться надлежащим образом в соответствии с условиями обязательства и требованиями закона, либо обычаев делового оборота или иными обычно предъявляемыми требованиями (главы 21–26 ГК РФ). Договор предполагается возмездным, то есть сторона должна получить плату или иное встречное представление за исполнение своих обязанностей. Если же одна сторона договора обязуется предоставить что-либо другой стороне без получения платы или иного встречного представления, такой договор признается безвозмездным (глава 27 ГК РФ).

List of key terms and word combinations:

– accord – согласие; соглашение

– consideration – встречное удовлетворение, предоставление; компенсация

– detriment – ущерб, вред; невыгода

– disputed amount – сумма иска, исковая сумма

– forbearance – воздержание от действия; отказ от принятия мер

– illusory promise – нереальное обещание

– option – выбор; право выбора; опцион; дискреционное право

– past consideration – предшествующее встречное удовлетворение

– pledgee – залогодержатель

– preexisting duties – ранее существовавшие обязательства

– promissory estoppel – лишение права возражения на основании данного обещания

– release – отказ от права; передача права другому лицу; документ об отказе от права или о передаче права

– satisfaction – исполнение

– statutes of limitations – закон об исковой давности

– unconscionable – недобросовестный

– undisputed amount – неоспоримое, бесспорное количество

The mutual promise to exchange things of value is called consideration.

It binds the parties together.
If an agreement has no consideration, it is not a binding contract.

Consideration consists of a mutual exchange of benefits and sacrifices between contracting parties. In the exchange, what is a benefit to the offeree is, at the same time, a sacrifice to the offerer. Likewise, the benefit bargained for by the offerer results in a sacrifice by the offeree. The legal term used for this sacrifice is detriment. A detriment is any of the following: doing (or promising to do) something that one has a legal right not to do; giving up (or promising to give up) something that one has a legal right to keep; and refraining from doing (or promising not to do) something that one half a legal right to do. This last type of detriment is known as forbearance. Consideration has three characteristics:

• promises made during bargaining are dependent on the consideration to be received;

• the consideration must involve something of value; and

• the benefits and detriments promised must be legal. Unless an agreement has been bargained for, the law will not enforce it. An agreement involves a bargained-for exchange when a promise is made in exchange for another promise, a promise is made in exchange for an act, or a promise is made for a forbearance of an act. The concept of bargaining means that each party is hurt in some way if the other party fails to keep a promise. Conversely, each party gains something when the promises are kept and the exchange is made.

It is important only that the parties freely agree on the value and the price. There is, however, an exception to this rule. Courts, at times, give a party relief when the consideration is so outrageous that it shocks the conscience of the public. A court may refuse to enforce a contract or any clause of that contract if it is considered unconscionable, that is, ridiculously inadequate, for example, when bargaining power between the two parties is greatly unequal.

Consideration requires that the benefits and sacrifices promised between the parties be legal.

Absence of legality renders the consideration invalid. Thus, a party cannot agree to do or promise to do something that he or she does not have the legal right to do.

Most often, consideration takes the form of money, property, services, or benefits and sacrifices.

A promise not to sue, when there is the right to sue, is enforceable when supported by consideration. Promising not to sue is a forbearance. A promise not to sue, in exchange for an amount of money, is a customary way to settle a pending lawsuit. Settlements of this type are often preferred to expensive and time-consuming litigation.

Acceptance of an agreement not to sue, supported by consideration, terminates one's right to continue any lawsuit, at present or in the future, on the grounds described in the agreement. A promise not to sue is commonly called a release.

When charitable pledges are made to fund a specific project, the pledgee's sacrifice is carrying out that project. In this sense, pledges are considered unilateral agreements, enforceable only when accepted by commencement of the proposed project.

Problems may arise when the consideration involved in a contract is money and the parties disagree as to the amount of money that the debtor owes the creditor.

A disputed amount, or unliquidated amount, is one on which the parties never agreed. Final settlement of disputed claims may lead to misunderstanding, dispute, and lengthy negotiation. If a creditor accepts as full payment an amount that is less than the amount due, then the dispute has been settled by an accord and satisfaction. Accord is the implied or expressed acceptance of less than what has been billed the debtor. Satisfaction is the agreed-to settlement as contained in the accord. Only if the dispute is honest, made in good faith, and not superficial or trivial will the courts entertain arguments based on accord and satisfaction.

An undisputed amount, or liquidated amount, is one on which the parties have mutually agreed.

Although a party may have second thoughts about the amount promised for goods or services rendered, the amount that was agreed to by the parties when they made their contract remains an undisputed amount. A partial payment in lieu of full payment when accepted by a creditor will not cancel an undisputed debt.

As a general rule, a contract is not enforceable if it lacks consideration.

Some jurisdictions have eliminated the element of consideration in a few specifically named contracts. Typical agreements falling into this category include promises bearing a seal, promises after discharge in bankruptcy, debts barred by the statute of limitations, promises enforced by promissory estoppel, and options governed by national law.

Persons discharged from indebtedness through bankruptcy may reaffirm and resume their obligations, as prompted, perhaps, by moral compulsion. The bankruptcy court must hold a hearing when a reaffirmation is intended, informing the debtor that reaffirmation is optional, not required, and informing the debtor of the legal consequences of reactivating a debt.

Laws known as statutes of limitations restrict the time within which a party is allowed to bring suit.

Under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, a promise may be enforceable without consideration. This doctrine is used, on occasion, to prevent injustice when a person changes his or her position significantly in reliance on another's promise and the promise is not fulfilled. The court will «estop» the person who made the promise from claiming that there was no consideration. Certain conditions must be met, however, before a court will apply this principle. First, the promise must be made to bring about action or forbearance by another person who gave no consideration. Second, the one who gave no consideration must have relied on the promise and must have changed his or her position in a significant way. Third, injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the promise.

An option is the giving of consideration to support an offerer's promise to hold an offer open for a stated or reasonable length of time.

The modern trade law has made an exception to the rule requiring consideration when the offer is made by a merchant; in such cases, an offer in writing by a merchant, stating the time period during which the offer will remain open, is enforceable without consideration.

Certain promises, however, the courts do not enforce because they lack even the rudimentary qualities of valid consideration. Included in this category are illusory promises, promises of future gifts, promises of legacies, promises based on past consideration, and promises based on preexisting duties.

An illusory promise is one that does not obligate the promisor to anything. A party who makes an illusory promise is the only one with any right to determine whether the other party will be benefited in any way. An illusory promise fails to provide the mutuality of promises required in establishing consideration.

Exercise 1. Comprehension questions:

1. Explain the term detriment.

2. What does the concept of bargaining mean?

3. When aren't the parties free to negotiate privately the amount of money to be paid?

4. Which problems might arise with consideration?

5. What does statute of limitation suppose?

6. Explain the doctrine of promissory estoppel.

7. When are charitable pledges used as consideration?

Exercise 2. Find in the text English equivalents to the following:

Согласие; встречное удовлетворение; ущерб; воздержание от действия; нереальное обещание; дискреционное право; предшествующее встречное удовлетворение; залогодержатель; ранее существовавшие обязательства; лишение права возражения на основании данного обещания; отказ от права; передача права другому лицу; документ об отказе от права или о передаче права; исполнение; закон об исковой давности; недобросовестный.

Exercise 3. Consult recommended dictionaries and give words or phrases to the following definitions:

Встречное требование; зачет встречного требования; однородное требование; предпочтительное удовлетворение требований; встречное заявление; основное требование; встречное удовлетворение; удовлетворение в части; оставление без удовлетворения.

Exercise 4.

Be ready to talk on one of the following topics:

1. Explain the term consideration and identify the characteristics necessary for valid consideration.

2. Describe the attitude of the court when dealing with questions that involve the adequacy of consideration.

3. Discuss the types of consideration that can be used to bind parties to one another in a contractual situation.

4. Outline the procedure that a debtor and creditor may use to settle a claim by means of accord and satisfaction.

5. Identify those agreements that may be enforceable by a court of law even though they lack consideration.

Exercise 5. Make up your own dialog on the case:

In Hanna v. Perkins, the buyer tendered a check with the notation «in full for labor and material to date.» The seller indorsed the check «Deposited under Protest» and deposited it. Seller sued for the balance of the contract price and buyer moved for summary judgment on the ground of accord and satisfaction. The New York court held for the seller and said that the defendant failed to allege the existence of an honest dispute about the amount due and thus there was no accord and satisfaction. The court held:

If it were not that this court finds that triable issues of fact are present, this court would deny the motion by holding this particular section of the code would seem to favor plaintiff's overriding endorsement of «Deposited under protest» as a reservation of his right to collect payment of the balance.

Exercise 6. Resume in industry buzz:

Consideration (each party makes 1 consideratn supported prom.)

1. 3 Tests for Consideration:

a. Prom. must induce current perf. in exchange (bargained for exchange).

b. Detriment from Promisor (offering detriment).

c. Promise binding, not illusory (mutuality of the prom.).

2. Promise Induced for Current Perf. in Exchange (giving $ or conduct):

a. Promises based on moral feelings FAIL.

b. Promises based on past acts & don't ask anything currently in exchange FAIL, EXCEPT:

(1) debt barred by technical defense, new written promise to revive enforceable (amt stated up to debt).

(2) Promisor requested act & promisee perf. w/ expectation of paymt, most enforce payment.

3. Detriment From Promisor (detriment to Promisee) Doing something promisor not otherwise required to do or NOT doing something promisor has rt or good faith belief had rt to do (can be a legal disadv. – not smoking):

a. Signif. MIN says if no detriment from promisor look for benefit to promisee.

b. NOT a detriment if Promisor had PRE-EXISTING duty to do it.


(1) unforeseen difficulty so severe could walk away but promise to do anyway.

(2) Good faith exception to disputed duties (misunderstand & new prom. to compromise; bona fide good faith dispute).

4. Binding, Not Illusory Promise: can't have unrestricted or total discretion on whether to perform (mutuality of obligation):

a. NOTE: Requirement & Output promises look illusory but not b/c Doe imposes reas. quantity requirement, nor are satisfaction conditions b/ c must be SUBJECTIVE good faith dissatisfaction.


a. Code Consideration Substitutes

-> Merchant's firm offer to keep open enforced up to 3 mos. unless consideration then for time stated.

-> For CODE, don't need consideration for modificatn IF MADE IN GOOD FAITH.

b. Common Law Consideration Substitutes:

(1) MIN accept Ks under seal w/o consideration, or

(2) Prom. Estoppel: if promisee detrimentally, reas. & foreseeably relies on promise, it's enforceable though no good consideration (buy car based on prom. to pay when your thumb smashed).

-> Make sure not good consideration 1st b/4 you apply these

<< | >>
Источник: Е.Г. Анисимова, С. В. Коростелёв. Английский язык для юристов. Предпринимательское право. 2011

Еще по теме Unit 6. ConsiderationВстречное предоставление:

  2. Unit 7. LegalityДействительность договора
  3. Unit 17. PartnershipТоварищество
  4. Unit 18. CorporationАкционерное общество
  5. Unit 3. Offer and AcceptanceОферта и акцепт
  6. Unit 8. Form of the AgreementФормы договоров
  7. Unit 16. Security DevicesСпособы обеспечения обязательств
  8. Unit 1. Tort Law. Деликтное право
  9. Unit 5. Contractual CapacityДоговорная правоспособность и дееспособность
  10. Unit 14. Checks and Bank CollectionsЧеки и инкассирование
  11. Unit 10. Discharge and RedemiesИсполнение обязательств и средства их обеспечения
  12. Unit 11. Nature and KindsСущность и виды оборотных документов
  13. Unit 12. Negotiation of Commercial PaperУчет оборотных документов
  14. Unit 15. The Nature of the Insurance ContractСущность договора страхования
  15. Unit 2Characteristics, and Status of ContractsСущность, характеристика и статус договоров
  16. Unit 9. Third Parties in Contract LawТретьи лица в договорном праве
  17. Unit 19. Corporate Management and Shareholder ControlУправление корпорацией и акционерный контроль
  18. Unit 4. Mutual Assent and Defective AgreementОбоюдное согласие и юридически дефектный договор